Blegoo banat
Deci… Blegoo are ban si de la zoso, si de la cristi. lol, zic.
Asta… la zoso.
La cristi, treaba arata asa:
Eu zic ca e bine… oricum, e la modul civilizat.
Nu mai stiu de ce m-a banat zoso (o fi stiind el de ce 
) dar in cazul lui cristi, el s-a suparat pe ce-am scris eu la comentarii aici. Acuma, stiu ca sunt prost, nesimtit si n-am maniere… dar chiar vreau sa intreb daca ce am zis eu se poate considera jignitor, in sensul propriu al cuvantului. In cuvintele nemuritorului Manafu… “Voi ce parere aveti?”
Monarhia in Romania
Profitand de nitel timp liber, dau si eu cu nasul ici-colo prin gloabe, ca tot omul.
Dau peste o chestie interesanta la zoso (http://www.zoso.ro/2008/06/pentru-regalisti.html) si inca una la WhiteWholf, unde m-am bagat in seama fara jena. Dar aia o sa fie o insemnare separata, ca n-am cum sa le amestec.
Deci, zice zoso:
“1. Mihai I al Romaniei nu e ala care si-a abandonat poporul si a fugit din tara speciat de comunisti?
2. Si pentru cele de mai sus i s-a retras titlul de “print de Hohenzolern”, pe care il folosea in loc de “Rege al Romaniei”, fiind fortat sa revina la titlul de “al Romaniei”, desi el nu prea voia?
Intreb si eu, pentru ca nu inteleg ce cauta cocalarul istoric omul asta in tara noastră.”
Ma rog, zoso, ca de obicei, se repede, poate lucrurile nu stau chiar asa… dar oricum, nu e treaba mea.
Dar am fost curios sa citesc si ce zice poporul, la comentarii, adica.
M-am intristat. Nu fiindca multi spun prostii – spun si eu din cand in cand, nu? Dar o cantitate asa mare de aiureli, scrise cu hotarare si siguranta de sine… mai rar.
“1. Mihai I al Romaniei nu e ala care si-a abandonat poporul si a fugit din tara speciat de comunisti?
Esential… corect. Ma rog, tonul e popular/zeflemitor…dar din pacate, asa este. Cateva detalii, pentru Citeste mai mult…
Durerea lui Vanghelie
Si, evident, rabdarea “boborului”…
Nu pot sa nu particip.
Vazut la piticu, vazut la grasutzu”, creat de mititelu, si preluat si de mine.
Cautarile romanilor pe internet
Tot romanul ramane “fruncea” cum ar zice cineva de la Cluj.
Nenea Cosmos publica rezultatele cautarilor pe net care au sfarsit la blogul dumisale.
Pe aceasta cale, doresc sa anunt ca Nenea e responsabil pentru faptul ca am schimbat tastatura in urma unui accident implicand o cana mare de cafea si un acces necontrolat de batzaiala citind postul lui.
Nota: Candva, mai demult, l-am suspectat pe Adrian ca inventeaza… chestii d-astea; mi-a dovedit cu screenshoturi. Deci, nu ma indoiesc de rezultatele serciurilor publicate de Nenea.
Doua citate:
“cum iti dai seama ca e atras de tine 1 – ii curge scuipat din gura”
(Adi Calarasu)
“cum se indoaie hirtia – Eşti nebun? Cum să îndoi hărtia? Criminalule!”
(Nenea)
Muncim, muncim, dar mai si radem
Fiind cu treaba peste cap, ca si alte kkaturi casnice, am neglijat sa mai scriu. Vine o vreme in viata oricarui blogher insa, cand se simte dator sa mai scrie una-alta. Asa si eu.
Neavand chef sa ma iau de evenimente curente, sociale sau politice, ofer ceva primit prin email. Deasemenea, scuze prietenilor, cunoscutilor si dusmanilor pe care (doar aparent) i-am abandonat.
Deci:
These are from a book called Disorder in the American Courts, and are things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and now published by court reporters who had the torment of staying calm while these exchanges were actually taking place.
ATTORNEY: Are you sexually active?
WITNESS: No, I just lie there.
ATTORNEY: Now doctor, isn’t it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn’t know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?
ATTORNEY: The youngest son, the twenty-one-year-old, how old is he?
WITNESS: Uh, he’s twenty-one.
ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS: Are you shitt’in me?
ATTORNEY: She had three children, right?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: How many were boys?
WITNESS: None.
ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?
WITNESS: Are you kidding? Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney. Can I get a new attorney?
ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS: By death.
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?
WITNESS: Now, whose death do you suppose terminated it?
ATTORNEY: Can you describe the individual?
WITNESS: He was about medium height and had a beard.
ATTORNEY: Was this a male or a female?
WITNESS: Guess.
ATTORNEY: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.
ATTORNEY: Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?
WITNESS: All my autopsies are performed on dead people. Would you like to rephrase that?
ATTORNEY: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
WITNESS: Oral.
ATTORNEY: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS: The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m.
ATTORNEY: And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS: No, he was sitting on the table, wondering why I was doing an autopsy on him!
ATTORNEY: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS: Huh….are you qualified to ask that question?
Si la sfarsit… cea mai buna!
ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: I see, but could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.
- @LetsDoItRo Rahat; să facem... CE? Susținem... CE?
- @blogatu Dacă sună bine, hai s-o facem ca lumea, nu? Hai să nu imităm tâmpeniile vestului, nu? Hai să gândim cu mintea nostră, nu a lor, nu?